|
About microphones |
|
|
|
|
|
Using microphones |
|
|
|
|
|
Where to buy |
|
|
|
|
|
About us |
|
|
|
|
|
Oktava MK-012
Multi Capsule Studio & Sound Reinforcement Condenser
|
|
Overview
|
The MK-012 is a compact, high quality
capacitor microphone with interchangeable capsules to provide a
choice of cardioid, hypercardioid or omni-directional polar
patterns.
The wide, flat response ensures that all sounds are captured with a high
degree of accuracy. A -10 dB pad is included for use in high SPL
environments. The capsules, which screw onto the microphone body,
utilise a precision, integral connection system to ensure reliable
electrical contact.
The MK-012 is suitable for use in any situation where an accurate sound
is required, the size of the system makes it ideal for use in broadcast,
sound for picture, installation, sound reinforcement and theatre
situations as well as the recording studio.
In pairs, the MK012s are perfectly suited for coincident and spaced
stereo miking techniques, and also overhead useage in live and studio
situations. Factory matched pairs can be specially ordered.
The MK-012 has following options:
MK-012 |
with 3 capsules |
MK-012-01 |
with 1 capsule |
MK-012-02 |
with 2 capsules |
MK-012 mini |
with mini preamp |
|
|
|
back to top
Technical specifications
|
Mic type |
Small diaphragm condenser |
Polar Pattern |
Cardioid,
Hypercardioid, Omnidirectional |
Freq. Response |
20-20000Hz |
Phantom voltage required |
48 +\- 2V |
Full impedance, module |
less than 300 ohms |
Weighted SPL (ref. DIN
45412) |
18 dBA |
Maximum SPL in 250-8000Hz range, (less
than 0.5% THD) |
130 db |
Free field sensitivity
at 1KHz |
10 mV/Pa |
Free field sensitivity roll off from 40Hz
to 20KHz should not exceed |
+\- 3 db |
Weight with 3 capsules and pad |
200 gr |
Length, mm |
128 |
Max diameter/width, mm |
23 |
Accessories included |
Mic holder |
Accessories optional |
Shock mount |
The difference in free field
sensitivity between 0° and 90° should be as follows: |
|
For omnidirectional
capsule: |
|
in 40-1000 Hz range: |
no more than 2 db |
in 1-5 KHz range: |
no more
than 4 db |
in 5-8 KHz range: |
no more than 8 db
|
For cardioid capsule: |
|
in 250-8000 Hz range: |
no less than 4 db |
For hypercardioid
capsule: |
|
in 250-5000 Hz range: |
no less than 8 db |
|
|
Average sensitivity difference between O°
and 180° for cardioid capsule in 63-12500 Hz range: |
16 db |
back to top
back to top
FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE
Oktava MK012 Capacitor Microphone
Sound on Sound
|
Oktava have created a storm in the microphone marketplace with
the MK219. Now they hope to follow up their initial success with the
MK012, designed for both studio and broadcast use.
PAUL WHITE dons his fur hat, converts some roubles, and gives it a
spin...
Oktava's MK219 has caused quite a stir in the
microphone world. It delivers a tonal performance to challenge mics
which its own list price wouldn't even pay the VAT on, despite a
standard of cosmetic finish that would make a Trabant engine casting
look like a work of art. In that respect, Oktava's MK012 microphone
couldn't be more different, being well-engineered and very
conservatively styled. As tends to be the case with ex-eastern bloc
microphones, the technology is largely 'borrowed' from the major mic
manufacturers, but implemented in a slightly less refined manner.
The basic package comprises the mic body plus a stand
clip, a 10dB pad and three individual capsules providing cardioid,
hypercardioid and omnidirectional pickup patterns. A figure-of-eight
capsule might have been more useful than two cardioid types -- the
importers tell me they're already looking into the possibility.
The capsules screw directly to the microphone body,
where the thread-to-thread contact forms the negative signal
conductor, and a central pin in the capsule mates with a sprung
contact in the microphone body to carry the positive signal. If the
10dB pad is needed, it fits between the mic body and the capsule.
Low noise, transformerless preamplifier circuitry is housed in the
mic body, and can be driven from any nominal 48V phantom powering
source. Unlike vocal mics, where the response is often deliberately
coloured, the 012 has a nominally flat frequency response extending
from 20Hz-20kHz -- though that's not to say that it isn't also a
good vocal mic.
I heard this mic as part of a comparative test
undertaken at the Gateway School of Recording in Kingston, where
they have a grand piano set up in the middle of a large studio.
Several mics were set up on boom stands about four feet away from
the open piano lid, and positioned as closely together as was
practical. We then repaired to the control room and scrutinised the
various mics while someone played the piano. Though every mic
produced a slightly different sound, the 012 stood up surprisingly
well, delivering a clean, open sound with plenty of depth. Further
studio tests revealed that the mic also works well with acoustic
guitars and, indeed, it should suit any application requiring an
honest, natural result. As you might expect, there's a reasonable
degree of consistency between the sounds produced by the three
available capsules. Two of these mics would make a versatile and
affordable stereo recording kit, though M&S recording is not
possible, because there's no figure-of-eight capsule.
Because this mic doesn't produce a coloured response,
it would be fine for classical and choral work, as well as for
recording smaller ensembles (for example, folk, chamber, or ethnic
music). Its small size also makes this mic suitable for broadcast,
sound-for-picture, installation, and theatre situations.
SUMMARY
Given the low cost, the MK012 is a surprisingly
competent and flexible microphone, suited to virtually any
application where an accurate sound is sought. In the project
studio, it can handle vocals and all manner of acoustic instruments,
and should also function as a top class sampling mic. A stereo pair
would make great drum overheads or location recording mics, and
their relatively high sensitivity means they could also be used for
gathering sound effects on location, without noise posing too much
of a problem.
There are plenty of professional mics already
available which do essentially the same job as the MK012, but none
at anything like the price. Traditionally, project studios go for
large diaphragm capacitor vocal mics, but given its very attractive
price, the MK012 makes a welcome and useful addition to the mic
locker. The MK012 is optionally available with an elastic suspension
cage, a phantom power supply, foam windshield and cable, all in a
wooden case. Given that this costs only £50 or so more than the
basic package, it adds further value to what is already a bargain.
|
EXHardware
Oktava Studio Microphones
Terry Kok
|
The Oktava MK-012
The MK-012 is the next microphone up on the list and
is a compact, high quality capacitor microphone with interchangeable
capsules to provide a choice of cardioid, hypercardioid or
omni-directional polar patterns. This is our favorite multi-purpose
microphone and we've successfully used it for miking instruments,
drums (especially good) or anything else in particular. The reason
behind this is the multi capsule design of the MK-012 which allows
you to choose between three different polar patterns matching your
application.
For vocals, the cardiod or hypercardiod patterns are
often used but I found the omni pattern to be the most useful
especially when recording acoustic guitars or stringed instruments
(violins, cellos). The MK-012 is a full range design with a
frequency response of 20Hz to 20kHz and comes with a -10db pad which
is useful when used under high sound pressure levels such as when
miking loud guitar amp stacks. MK-012 In Use
As I mentioned earlier on, the MK-012 is my favourite multi purpose
microphone, I've done many recording sessions miking everything from
guitars to violins to drums and I've always been impressed by the
flexibility of the MK-012. When used with vocals, I strongly suggest
that you use a pop screen with it as the MK-012 is a rather
sensitive microphone and tends to pick up a lot of pops in vocals if
used without a screen.
If you're on a tight budget, I'd personally pick the
MK-012 as it's flexibility allows novice home studio enthusiasts the
flexibility of having a few mics cramped into one amazingly compact
package. The MK-012 works very well with acoustic guitars and
violins and because of the sensitivity of the mic. Like the MK-319 ,
it managed to capture alot of detail and if spaced sufficiently from
the instrument, also records a very nice room ambience in the
recording. Somehow though, I preferred the MK-319 for use with
acoustic instruments because the MK-319 had warm sound which
complements these stringed instruments which the MK-012 lacked.
The best application for the MK-012 I feel, would be a drum set. It
worked exceptionally well on our Pearl kick drum because of the full
range offered by the MK-012. It worked really well too at a snare or
tom position as the sensitivity of the mic captured a very nice
attack on snare beats. Overall, the MK-012 is an excellent compact
and flexible microphone that is a must in any studio, especially if
you're looking for a multipurpose microphone!
Conclusion The three Oktava microphones (MK-319,
MK-012 and ML-52) reviewed are amazing performers for the price.
First up, we have the MK-319 which is magical with vocals and
stringed/acoustic instruments. Then comes the MK-012 which is
another amazing performer that is so flexible, it's like having a
whole bunch of mics cramped into one compact design. Get a stereo
matched set and have them setup as drum set overheads! Last but not
least, the ribbon based ML52 proves yet again that ribbon mics
should not be forgotten offering an inviting and warm sound. If
you're looking for great microphones that offer an amazing value for
your money, I would not hesitate to suggest that you give the Oktava
line an audition. Highly recommended!
|
Royer Labs SF-1 by Myles Boisen
|
You'll find here information about MK-012 applications as well. |
Enregistrement batterie + pedalboard
|
http://www.magmor.org/delirium/enregistrement-batterie-pedalboard/ |
Drum overhead mic shootout and review: Oktava MK-012, AKG C1000S, EV 635a
|
Review by Matthew Mcglynn of debris.com from 15.09.2005 |
CIAO Unabhängige Kaufberatung (Independent purchase
consultation)
|
Erfahrungsbericht von locationrecording über Oktava Oktava M012
1. Mai 2002 |
Mikrofontest of three Oktava microphones
|
Studio Magazin
11/07 |
An Overview of Popular Short Shotgun, Supercardioid, Hypercardiod and Cardioid Microphones
By Dan Brockett
|
As I Hear It - Choosing the Right Microphone By Dan Brockett
|
Oktava MC012 - The Tape Op Review
|
TapeOp Issue #25/September, 2001 | by Andy Hong |
Oktava MK-012 - the review in Mojo Pie
|
Oktava MK-012
You'll be Russian to buy the Oktava MK-012 small condensers |
back to top
User comments
|
Sound Quality |
Overall Rating |
Clean sounding very accurate
sound reproduction with no significant coloring to the sound to my ears. I
have read scores of user review and those that have a basis for direct
comparision rate them favorably against Neumans-- I run mine through either
an Art Mic Tube Pac--or an Art (dual channel) Voiced Valve pre amp with
OPL-- sounds great with both. So far my working experience is to use these
mics to record both a big band jazz ensemble and jazz combo. I use a stereo
(near coincident) mic pattern with very good results. I have also
experimented a bit with using the stereo pair on acoustic guitar with an XY
pattern with favorable reproduction of the natural acoustics. Looking foward
to doing many projects with these mics. |
I love these mics--so much so
I ordered an MK-319 large diaphram--- I think the general consensus given
the price vs the quality/sound of these mics is that they hold their own
against some very high end icons. If your looking for a budget mic for a
personal studio or even for professional purpose I think you will find these
good mics |
OK, so I guess I'm easily
impressed. Wow. I've been using a Sure Beta 58 for vocals & a Sure 57 for
guitar or for drums & percussion. I know that's a pretty humble start, but
this is a quantum leap in sound quality. The night I got my pair from Guitar
Center. I plugged one into my Mackie 1604 VLZ board, put some headphones on
& played acoustic guitar into it. The mic was about 18" away. I was
transfixed. The guitar sounded better than it does in real life. Warm, rich,
silky on the top end, and all together intoxicating.I also used it this
morning to do some voiceover. I spoke through a pop filter with the mic
about 7" back & to the side a bit. Fantastic! The sound is very rich, but
not at all muddy. I never really like the sound of my recorded voice . . .
until now. I listened to it over & over narcisistically goofing around with
the compression & De-Esser settings in Cubase. It sounded like a male radio
voice with the rich deep bottom end.
I'm a believer now. I guess they're not really ideal for stage use as a
vocal mic, but what a boon for any recording enthusiast. Now I need to
figure out how I can feed them Phantom Power for location video shoots. |
I'm absolutely ecstatic that
I own these mics now. I'm sure there are better mics out there, but
presently I don't have the resources to buy Neumans or AKGs or any of the
other fine condensor mics I'd love to get. These mics are a quantum leap
above the Sure dynamic mics I've been using (sm57 & beta58). I can't wait to
try them out on drums & percussion.
Of course, if you don't own any mics, you might want to get a Sure SM57
first. It's a good all around mic & you can talk or sing right into it. You
can't talk into the Oktava MK-012 without a pop-filter. Even from 2' away,
your unfiltered breath makes booming noises on the Oktava's VERY sensitive
capsule.
My guess is that I'll buy all the Oktava models & get the various capsules
for the MK-012's before I start buying other microphones. Of course one day
I'd like to have an AKG or two & Neumann U-87, & a couple of Sennheisers, a
Sure 421, etc. But for the time being, I'll put all the money I would have
spent into the other facets of my studio |
Good sounding mic. Nice for
acoustic guitar, surprisingly good on female vocals. Well known to be good
as drum/percussion overhead. I like it as the "far mic" when 2-mic'ing
electric guitar. Sound can vary from on mic to another, but have yet to hear
one that sounded bad, only different. All three capsules sound good on mine |
Very good value if you aren't
afriad of trying a few and buying the one(s) you like. I've bought more.
Nice general purpose mic that excels in certain applications. Very good
bang-for-the-$. Be sure and check out a wind screen |
I use them pretty much for
drum overheads only and they sound fantastic. I record traditonal music:
rockaiblly, country, jazz & blues so they really capture that room sound
very well. I have not tried them for anyting else. |
Proabably the best deal I got
on a pair of mics that perform like champs. I would reccomend these to
anyone who is on a budget but still want to get a great sound. These mics
are the most versatile but for what they serve they are great. |
I've had great luck with
these mics on drums (toms in particular and CERTAIN snare drums) and
acoustic guitars that aren't too boomy. They add a nice, woody quality. I
also recently did a bluegrass session and had fantastic luck with them on
dobro and mandolin. I have used them on female vocals, but because of
sibilance they wouldn't really be my first choice. My favorite use so far,
however has been use as an ambient mic in a room or concert hall setting.
They blew away the sound of my AKG 414s in this application. They have a
nice, smooth top more along the lines of a Neumann KM84 than an AKG 451 or
AT 40 series. |
Love 'em. I bought four of
them and am considering getting two more. And from what I understand, these
mics were designed in 1963, so I would consider them sufficiently
beta-tested. And just so you know, the new Oktava ML-52 ribbon mics are
AMAZING! |
I really like these for drum
overheads. That's the primary use in our studio. They are a poor mans KM184.
Not quite in the same league, but at less than 1/10th the price, I'll run
with these for a while. I've also used them on acoustic guitar and liked
them quite a bit. I just have the cardiod capsules, so don't know about the
omni or others. I have tried the pads and don't like them at all. They seem
to change the sound too much. If you need pads, I'd say use an inline pad or
other. These are very warm sounding and make the toms sound great when used
as overheads. Ditto on acoustic guitar...very warm. They sound better with a
less boomy guitar too. Use em on your Gibsons, not the Martins. |
Overall, I love these
mics...hardly a day goes by in the studio that I'm not using these for
something. If these were ever lost or stolen, I'd definitely grab some more.
As far as comparing with other, similar mics.....if you can afford the
Neumanns or Schoeps mics, then get them. If you can't, then grab a pair of
these...you won't be sorry. Even if you have some of the Neumanns or Schoeps,
grab a pair as well...for a few hundred dollars you might find you like
them. |
Here's the big surprise --
These sound really nice! I agree with Chris about the accentuated lower mids,
but I find that these mics sound smoother and more relaxed than many other
condensers. I tried a pair in X-Y on a Yamaha grand piano (which can sound a
bit on the bright side) and the MC-012's sounded rich and full, very smooth.
This is a really good 'beginners' or hobbyist mic, and can be a great
workaday pro's mic too. The self-noise is higher than in an AKG or AT small
condenser, but not so much that it would be a problem in low-budget
circumstances (if you're going to record a symphony I'd expect you'd have
the budget to rent a pair of B&K, Earthworks or Neumann mics!). I'll give it
an 8 because of the slight lack of transparency and the 'thick' lower mids,
but I just finished comparing it to a Neumann fer chrissakes! |
I'm going to give this mic an
extra couple of points for its low price. I use my pair of MC-012's through
a Mackie 1202VLZ into a DAT recorder, into an Alesis Studio 12R and ADAT
XT20, or from the Mackie into my RME DIGI96/8 PAD (24 bit). So far, I've
recorded acoustic jazz piano and classical guitar with these mics. Both
projects worked out very well. These mics sound whttp://www.oktava-online.com/style.cssy better than a hundred
bucks' worth. They're not Neumanns or C451s, but they're less sizzley than
the cheaper AT mics and more musical sounding than Shure SM81's (in my
opinion, anyway) or AKG C3000. If you need to record a solo piano or string
quartet in less than ideal circumstances, these things will work much better
than an AT825 or similar. There are a few things to watch, however -- One,
while they sound good on singers, always use a pop screen on all vocals.
These things go nuts on plosives. Two, they can boom like crazy if you use
them too close to acoustic instruments. Three, you need to be careful when
you thread the capsule to the body and/or the -10dB pad, because of the
crude machining of the threads. But I'd buy another one if I had to. So
there! |
back to top |
|